Integration pending 4h estimated Tier 5 Annual Impact Summary — Core Business Services

Integration Purpose

Verify integration with dependent epics: epic-annual-impact-summary-foundation

This integration checkpoint ensures proper coordination and compatibility between different epics. It verifies that all interfaces, data flows, and dependencies are correctly implemented before proceeding.

Execution Context

Execution Tier
Tier 5

Tier 5 - 253 tasks

Can start after Tier 4 completes

Integration Task

Handles integration between different epics or system components. Requires coordination across multiple development streams.

Task Status
Statuspending
TypeIntegration
Estimated4h
Tier5
Parent Epic
Annual Impact Summary — Core Business Services
Annual Impact Summary (Wrapped)
Epic Risks (3)
high impact medium prob integration

Activity records may contain duplicate entries (as evidenced by the duplicate-detection feature dependency) or proxy-registered activities that should be attributed differently. Including duplicates or mis-attributed records would produce inflated stats, undermining trust in the summary.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Implement the aggregation query to join against the deduplication-reviewed-flag on activity records and filter out unresolved duplicates. Coordinate with the duplicate-detection feature team to confirm the authoritative flag field before implementing the RPC. Include a data-quality warning in the summary when unresolved duplicates are detected.

Contingency: If deduplication state is unreliable at release time, add a prominent disclaimer in the summary UI noting that figures reflect all registered activities and may include duplicates pending review. Track a follow-up task to re-aggregate after deduplication runs.

medium impact high prob scope

Each organisation wants to define their own milestone thresholds (e.g., NHF's counting model differs from HLF's certification model). Implementing configurable thresholds may expand scope significantly if the configuration UI is expected in this epic.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Scope this epic strictly to the evaluation engine and a hardcoded default threshold set. Define the MilestoneDefinition interface with an organisation_id discriminator so per-org configs can be loaded from the database in a later sprint. Build the admin configuration UI as a separate follow-on task outside this epic.

Contingency: If stakeholders require per-org milestone configuration before launch, deliver a JSON-based configuration file per org as an interim solution, loaded from Supabase storage, until a full admin UI is built.

medium impact medium prob technical

Android 13+ restricts access to media collections and requires READ_MEDIA_IMAGES permission for gallery saves, while older Android versions use WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE. Handling both permission models correctly across the device matrix is error-prone.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Use the permission_handler Flutter package with version-aware permission requests abstracted behind the summary-share-service interface. Write platform-specific unit tests for both Android API levels in the test harness. Test on a minimum of three Android versions (API 29, 32, 34) in CI.

Contingency: If gallery save is broken on specific Android versions at launch, disable the 'Save to gallery' option on affected API levels and surface only clipboard and system share sheet, which require no media permissions.