Implement ActivitySummaryAggregator service
epic-benefit-calculator-ui-and-share-task-003 — Build the service that queries the local database for a peer mentor's activity records and aggregates them into session count and total duration values. The aggregator accepts optional date-range filters and returns a typed summary object consumed by the BenefitCalculationService. Ensure the query is performant on large datasets.
Acceptance Criteria
Technical Requirements
Execution Context
Tier 1 - 540 tasks
Can start after Tier 0 completes
Implementation Notes
Use Supabase's .rpc() or aggregate query pattern for server-side count/sum. If the Supabase table doesn't yet support direct aggregation via PostgREST, consider a Postgres function (RPC) that accepts mentor_id, start_date, end_date and returns {session_count, total_duration_minutes} — this is the most performant approach and avoids fetching 380 rows. Define the abstract interface IActivitySummaryAggregator so the BenefitCalculationService can be tested independently. Place the service at lib/features/benefit_calculator/services/activity_summary_aggregator.dart.
For the DateTimeRange parameter, use Flutter's DateTimeRange from dart:ui or define a project-local equivalent to avoid Flutter dependency in pure-logic layers. Document the required database index (CREATE INDEX idx_activities_mentor_status_time ON activities(mentor_id, status, start_time)) in a comment or migration file.
Testing Requirements
Unit tests using flutter_test and mocktail covering: correct aggregation from a multi-row mock result, empty result handling, date range filter forwarding, partial data (null duration) handling, and verification that no direct Supabase call exists in the service class (architecture boundary test). Integration test (optional, CI-gated) verifying correct Supabase query structure and aggregation against a test database. Aim for 90%+ branch coverage.
The RepaintBoundary PNG capture approach for sharing the results card may produce blurry or oversized images on high-DPI devices, or may silently fail on certain Android OEM configurations that restrict off-screen rendering. A failed share would break one of the core use cases (recruitment tool).
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Implement the capture using the established screenshot-capture-utility pattern already present in the Wrapped summary feature (component 542-screenshot-capture-utility). Test on a range of iOS and Android devices including Samsung and Huawei OEM builds during development. Set explicit pixel ratio (3.0) when calling toImage() to guarantee resolution.
Contingency: If image capture fails on a platform, the BenefitShareService falls back to sharing the plain-text summary only, with a user-facing message explaining the image could not be generated. This ensures the share flow never fully blocks.
Implementing full WCAG 2.2 AA compliance for the results card and metric tiles — including live regions, focus management, and semantic labels that read naturally in Norwegian — requires deep familiarity with Flutter semantics APIs. Gaps may only surface during screen reader testing on physical devices, late in the sprint.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Use the existing semantics-wrapper-widget (606) and live-region-announcer (608) components from the accessibility feature rather than implementing custom semantics. Assign screen reader testing on a physical iPhone with VoiceOver as a mandatory acceptance gate, not an afterthought. Write widget tests using Flutter's AccessibilityGuideline matchers early in development.
Contingency: If screen reader issues are found late, the pure semantic markup approach (no Canvas numbers, all Semantics wrappers) limits the blast radius to label text corrections. Escalate to the accessibility feature team for a pairing session to resolve complex focus management issues.
The BenefitResultsCard must match the Wrapped design language used in the annual summary feature. If design tokens or widget patterns are inconsistent between the two features, the results card will look out of place and undermine the intended emotional impact for sharing.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Review the existing Wrapped summary screen (529-wrapped-summary-screen) and stat card widget (530-stat-card-widget) implementations before building the results card. Reuse design tokens from the existing design-token-theme (200) system. Involve the designer in a review of the results card mock-up against the Wrapped language before implementation begins.
Contingency: If design parity issues are discovered post-implementation, isolate visual adjustments to the BenefitResultsCard widget. The feature's business logic and accessibility compliance are unaffected by visual polish changes.