Register ReportPeriodValidator as Riverpod provider
epic-bufdir-report-period-selection-services-task-007 — Wrap ReportPeriodValidatorImpl in a Riverpod Provider (reportPeriodValidatorProvider) with the PeriodConfigurationRepository injected via ref.watch. Ensure the provider is scoped correctly so that organisation context is read from the active tenant session and not hardcoded. Add provider override stubs for use in widget and BLoC unit tests.
Acceptance Criteria
Technical Requirements
Execution Context
Tier 4 - 323 tasks
Can start after Tier 3 completes
Implementation Notes
Provider definition pattern: `final reportPeriodValidatorProvider = Provider
Testing Requirements
Create `test/helpers/report_period_validator_mocks.dart` exporting: (1) a `MockReportPeriodValidator` class implementing `ReportPeriodValidator` with configurable return values, and (2) a `reportPeriodValidatorOverride(ReportPeriodValidator mock)` helper that returns a `Override` for use in `ProviderContainer` and `ProviderScope` in tests. This file is test-infrastructure only — do not import it from `lib/`.
Detecting overlap with previously submitted reports requires querying a report history table that may not yet exist or may not have a reliable submitted_at / period_end field, making the validator dependent on an incomplete upstream feature (Bufdir Report History & Audit Log).
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Define the minimum interface (a single repository method: getSubmittedPeriods(orgId) → List<DateTimeRange>) as an abstract class in this epic. Implement a stub that returns an empty list until the history feature is available, so the validator compiles and passes tests without a real data source.
Contingency: If the history feature is delayed beyond this feature's delivery window, ship the validator with the stub returning an empty list (overlap check disabled) and surface a feature-flag-controlled warning banner explaining that overlap detection will be enabled in a future update.
Bufdir's structural requirements for reporting periods (complete calendar months, grant-year span restrictions) may be ambiguous or subject to change, causing the validator to enforce rules that are incorrect or overly restrictive for some organisations.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Document the specific Bufdir rules being enforced in the validator's source code as named constants with references to the relevant Bufdir guidelines. Review the rules with at least one coordinator representative before implementation is finalised.
Contingency: Expose a per-org configuration flag (strict_bufdir_validation: bool) in the period configuration repository so that rule enforcement can be relaxed for specific organisations without a code deployment.