Integration pending 4h estimated Tier 4 Bulk Registration Orchestration and Unified State Management

Integration Purpose

Verify integration with dependent epics: epic-coordinator-proxy-registration-foundation, epic-coordinator-proxy-registration-core

This integration checkpoint ensures proper coordination and compatibility between different epics. It verifies that all interfaces, data flows, and dependencies are correctly implemented before proceeding.

Execution Context

Execution Tier
Tier 4

Tier 4 - 323 tasks

Can start after Tier 3 completes

Integration Task

Handles integration between different epics or system components. Requires coordination across multiple development streams.

Task Status
Statuspending
TypeIntegration
Estimated4h
Tier4
Parent Epic
Bulk Registration Orchestration and Unified State Management
Coordinator Proxy Registration for Contacts
Epic Risks (3)
high impact high prob scope

Partial failures in bulk registration — where some mentors succeed and others fail — create a complex UX state that is easy to mishandle. If the UI does not clearly communicate which records succeeded and which failed, coordinators may re-submit already-saved records (creating duplicates) or miss failed records entirely (creating underreporting).

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Design the per-mentor result screen as a primary deliverable of this epic, not an afterthought. Use a clear list view with success/failure indicators per mentor name, and offer a 'Retry failed' action that pre-selects only the failed mentors for resubmission.

Contingency: If partial failure UX proves too complex to deliver within scope, implement a simpler all-or-nothing submission mode for the initial release with a clear error message listing which mentors failed, and defer the partial-retry UI to a follow-up sprint.

medium impact medium prob technical

Submitting proxy records for a large group (e.g., 30+ mentors) as individual Supabase inserts may cause latency issues or hit rate limits, degrading the coordinator experience and potentially causing timeout failures that leave data in an inconsistent state.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Implement the BulkRegistrationOrchestrator to batch inserts using a Supabase RPC call that accepts an array of proxy records, reducing round-trips to a single network call. Add progress indication using a stream of per-record results if the RPC supports it.

Contingency: If the RPC approach is blocked by Supabase limitations, fall back to chunked parallel inserts (5 records per batch) with retry logic, capping total submission time and surface a progress bar to manage coordinator expectations.

medium impact medium prob technical

Unifying state management for both single and bulk proxy flows in a single BLoC risks state leakage between flows — for example, a previously selected mentor list persisting when a coordinator switches from bulk to single mode — causing confusing UI states or incorrect submissions.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Define separate, named state subtrees within the BLoC for single-proxy state and bulk-proxy state, with explicit reset events triggered on flow entry. Write unit tests for state isolation scenarios using the bloc_test package.

Contingency: If unified BLoC state becomes unmanageable, split into two separate BLoCs (ProxySingleRegistrationBLoC and ProxyBulkRegistrationBLoC) sharing only common events via a parent coordinator Cubit.