Implement Bulk Approval Action Bar Widget
epic-expense-approval-workflow-coordinator-ui-task-012 — Build the BulkApprovalBar Flutter widget that appears when one or more claims are selected in the review queue. Display selected count, Approve All and Reject All action buttons, and a clear-selection control. Integrate with BulkApprovalProcessor and disable buttons during processing with a loading indicator. Meets WCAG 2.2 AA touch target requirements.
Acceptance Criteria
Technical Requirements
Execution Context
Tier 5 - 253 tasks
Can start after Tier 4 completes
Implementation Notes
Keep BulkApprovalBar a pure stateless widget — all state (selectedIds, isProcessing) lives in the parent BLoC. Pass callbacks (onApprove, onReject, onClearSelection) as VoidCallback or typed function parameters. Use AnimatedSlide with a Tween
For the snackbar, dispatch a ShowSnackbarEvent to the BLoC after BulkApprovalResult is received rather than calling ScaffoldMessenger directly inside the widget — this keeps the widget testable without a Scaffold ancestor. The '44x44dp touch target' requirement means wrapping small icon buttons in a SizedBox(width: 44, height: 44) with GestureDetector if using custom controls, or relying on IconButton's default padding which already meets this.
Testing Requirements
Widget tests: render with selectedCount=0 and assert widget is not visible. Render with selectedCount=3 and assert '3 selected' label, both action buttons enabled. Simulate tap on Approve All and assert onApprove callback is called. Simulate tap on Reject All and assert confirmation dialog appears; confirm and assert onReject is called.
Render with isProcessing=true and assert both buttons are disabled and progress indicator is visible. Assert touch target sizes >= 44dp using tester.getSize(). Verify Semantics labels contain the claim count. Golden test: snapshot in default, processing, and zero-selection states.
Target 90% branch coverage.
Maintaining multi-select state across paginated list pages is architecturally complex in Flutter with Riverpod/BLoC. If the selection state is stored in the widget tree rather than the state layer, page transitions and list redraws can silently clear selections, causing coordinators to lose their multi-select and re-enter it.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Store the selected claim ID set in a dedicated Riverpod StateNotifier outside the paginated list widget tree. The paginated list reads selection state from this provider and does not own it. Selection persists independently of list scroll position or page loads.
Contingency: If cross-page selection proves prohibitively complex, limit bulk selection to the currently visible page (add a clear warning in the UI) and prioritise single-page bulk approval for the initial release.
If a coordinator has the queue open while another coordinator approves claims from the same queue (possible in large organisations with shared chapter coverage), the Realtime update may arrive out of order or be missed during a reconnect, leaving the first coordinator's view stale and allowing them to attempt to approve an already-actioned claim.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: The ApprovalWorkflowService's optimistic locking (from the foundation epic) will catch the concurrent edit at the database level. The CoordinatorReviewQueueScreen should handle the resulting ConcurrencyException by removing the claim from the local list and showing a brief snackbar: 'This claim was already actioned by another coordinator.'
Contingency: Add a queue staleness indicator (a subtle 'last updated X seconds ago' label) and a manual refresh button as a fallback for coordinators who notice inconsistencies.
The end-to-end test requirement that a peer mentor receives a push notification within 30 seconds of coordinator approval depends on FCM delivery latency, which is outside the application's control and can vary significantly in CI/CD environments.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Structure end-to-end tests to verify notification intent (correct FCM payload dispatched, correct Realtime event emitted) rather than actual device delivery timing. Use test doubles for FCM delivery in automated tests and reserve real-device delivery tests for manual pre-release validation.
Contingency: If notification timing requirements must be validated in automation, instrument the ApprovalNotificationService with a test hook that records dispatch timestamps and assert against those rather than actual FCM callbacks.