Add SensitiveFieldWarningDialog confirmation flow and focus restoration
epic-screen-reader-support-core-services-task-011 — Implement the full confirmation flow for SensitiveFieldWarningDialog: on Confirm the sensitive field is revealed and focus returns to it; on Cancel the field remains hidden and focus returns to the trigger element. Persist the user's per-session confirmation decision to avoid repeated dialogs for the same field within one app session. Integrate with FocusManagementService for correct focus restoration after dialog dismissal.
Acceptance Criteria
Technical Requirements
Execution Context
Tier 3 - 413 tasks
Can start after Tier 2 completes
Implementation Notes
Model the confirmation flow as a small state machine: FieldState {masked, awaitingConfirmation, revealed}. Use a Riverpod StateNotifierProvider per field instance (keyed by SensitiveFieldType + optional field ID for lists with multiple same-type fields). The session cache provider should be a simple StateProvider
After awaiting showDialog(), call FocusManagementService in a post-frame callback (WidgetsBinding.instance.addPostFrameCallback) to ensure the dialog route has fully popped before requesting focus. For the scroll-inside-list case, call Scrollable.ensureVisible(sensitiveFieldContext) before moveFocusTo to handle off-screen triggers.
Testing Requirements
Write widget integration tests covering the full confirmation flow end-to-end. Test cases: (1) Confirm → field revealed + focus on field, (2) Cancel → field hidden + focus on trigger, (3) second trigger for same SensitiveFieldType skips dialog (session cache hit), (4) logout clears session cache (next trigger shows dialog again), (5) unmounted trigger on Cancel does not crash, (6) dialog opens with focus on Confirm button for screen reader users, (7) flow works inside a ListView (trigger may require scroll-into-view). Use AccessibilityTestHarness for focus verification. Target ≥90% branch coverage on the confirmation state machine.
Flutter's build pipeline and SemanticsService.announce() operate asynchronously. Announcements triggered too early (before the semantic tree settles) may be swallowed silently on both platforms, causing acceptance criteria around the 500ms window to fail intermittently in CI and on device, which would block pilot launch.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Implement the LiveRegionAnnouncer with a post-frame callback delay and an internal timing guard. Write integration tests using WidgetTester.pump() sequences that verify announcement delivery across multiple frame boundaries. Validate on physical devices at each sprint boundary, not only in CI.
Contingency: If consistent announcement timing cannot be achieved within Flutter's semantic pipeline, switch to a platform channel approach that calls native UIAccessibility.post (iOS) and AccessibilityManager.announce (Android) directly, bypassing Flutter's intermediary.
Flutter does not natively emit a focus-gain event to Dart code when VoiceOver or TalkBack moves focus to a specific widget. If the intercept mechanism for the SensitiveFieldWarningDialog relies on an unsupported or undocumented hook in the semantics tree, it may miss focus events for some field types or in some navigation contexts, leaving sensitive data unprotected.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Prototype the focus-intercept mechanism during the first sprint of this epic, before building the dialog UI. Evaluate Flutter's SemanticsBinding.instance callbacks and custom SemanticsActions as intercept points. Document the chosen mechanism with platform compatibility notes.
Contingency: If no reliable focus-intercept is available, implement an alternative where sensitive fields show a static 'Screen reader active — tap to reveal' overlay instead of an OS dialog, which is less seamless but achieves equivalent privacy protection without relying on an unreliable event hook.
The AccessibilityTestHarness depends on internal flutter_test semantic tree APIs that can change between Flutter minor versions. If the project upgrades Flutter during this epic, the harness may break silently, causing CI accessibility tests to pass while actually skipping assertions.
Mitigation & Contingency
Mitigation: Pin the Flutter SDK version in pubspec.yaml for the duration of this epic. Document which flutter_test APIs are used and their stability tier. Add a canary test that explicitly fails if the semantic tree API surface changes.
Contingency: If a forced Flutter upgrade breaks the harness, prioritise patching the harness as a blocking task before any other epic work continues, using the canary test failure as the trigger.