medium priority low complexity documentation pending documentor Tier 7

Acceptance Criteria

Documentation is a single Markdown file (docs/accessibility-foundation.md) committed to the repository root docs/ directory
Section 1 explains the Accessibility Token Manifest structure: what each token category means, how constants are named, and how to add a new token with a concrete example
Section 2 provides a minimal Dart code snippet showing how to read a color token via Riverpod (ref.watch(designTokenProvider).colors.primary) in both a widget and a non-widget context
Section 3 explains ContrastRatioValidator: how to call it programmatically, what the return value means, and how to integrate it in a CI script
Section 4 lists each lint rule, the WCAG 2.2 AA criterion it enforces, and a before/after code example showing a violation and its corrected form
Section 5 contains a 'Why this matters' rationale paragraph per organization: NHF (cognitive accessibility, stroke survivors), Blindeforbundet (screen reader and VoiceOver dependency), HLF (high contrast for hearing-impaired users), Barnekreftforeningen (child users with varying ability)
Documentation is reviewed and approved by at least one team member before merge (PR review required)
All code snippets compile without errors when pasted into a Flutter project using the defined tech stack

Technical Requirements

frameworks
Flutter
Riverpod
flutter_test
data models
AccessibilityTokenManifest
DesignTokenProvider
ContrastRatioValidator
security requirements
Documentation must not include any real user data, API keys, or organization-specific personal information

Execution Context

Execution Tier
Tier 7

Tier 7 - 84 tasks

Can start after Tier 6 completes

Implementation Notes

Write for a mid-level Flutter developer who is new to the project. Use plain English. Avoid jargon without explanation. Structure each section with a 'What', 'How', and 'Why' sub-pattern.

For the ContrastRatioValidator section, show both the programmatic API call and the CLI invocation pattern so both app developers and DevOps engineers can use it. In the rationale section, be specific: reference that Blindeforbundet users depend on VoiceOver/JAWS and that any color token bypassing the token system will fail their assistive technology; reference that NHF users include stroke survivors for whom cognitive load is a clinical concern, not a UX preference. Keep the document under 1,500 words — if a section grows too large, link to the relevant source file instead of duplicating content. Ensure all code examples use the exact provider names and constant identifiers defined in the implementation tasks.

Testing Requirements

Documentation quality validation: (1) all Dart code snippets must be extracted and run through dart analyze to confirm they are error-free; (2) a peer review checklist must confirm all four organizations are mentioned with correct context; (3) confirm all internal links to source files (e.g., lib/design_tokens/accessibility_token_manifest.dart) resolve to actual paths. No automated test suite required, but a CI doc-lint step using markdownlint is recommended.

Component
Accessibility Token Manifest
data low
Epic Risks (3)
high impact medium prob technical

The WCAG 2.2 relative luminance formula requires gamma-corrected sRGB calculations. Floating-point rounding differences between Dart and reference implementations could produce off-by-one classifications for near-threshold color pairs, resulting in pairs that just pass or just fail in CI but behave differently at runtime.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Implement the algorithm directly from the WCAG 2.2 specification using the exact linearisation constants. Validate the Dart implementation against the W3C reference test vectors and against a known-good JavaScript implementation for at least 50 color pairs spanning the compliance boundaries.

Contingency: If discrepancies are found, add a configurable tolerance margin (e.g., ±0.005 on the ratio) and flag near-threshold pairs as warnings rather than hard failures, escalating to the design team for manual review.

medium impact high prob scope

The token manifest is a static data file. If developers add new color tokens to the design-token-provider without updating the manifest, the manifest becomes stale and the CI validator produces false negatives — passing builds that contain unvalidated color pairs.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Add a CI step that cross-references every token constant exported by the design-token-provider against the manifest at build time, failing if any token is present in the provider but absent from the manifest. Document this requirement clearly in the contributing guide.

Contingency: If drift is detected post-merge, run a full manifest regeneration script and treat the resulting manifest diff as a blocking pull request with mandatory accessibility review.

medium impact medium prob dependency

The flutter_accessibility_lints package (or custom lint rules) may produce false positives on patterns the team deliberately uses — for example, decorative icon widgets that intentionally omit semantic labels. Excessive false positives will lead developers to add blanket ignore comments, undermining the entire lint strategy.

Mitigation & Contingency

Mitigation: Audit the full lint rule set against the existing codebase before enabling rules. Create a documented list of approved ignore-comment patterns with mandatory justification comments. Restrict ignore patterns to decorative-only contexts.

Contingency: If false positive rates exceed 10% of lint output, disable the highest-noise individual rules and replace them with targeted custom lint rules scoped to the specific patterns the team controls.